Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '18 at 09:16
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 856 78% 655 Pts	64-Core 1,265 78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 110 Parallax 97 87% 105 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 98.5 Splatting 99.2 80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLW256HEHP-000MV 256GB 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB72M0Q Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,728 Write 320 Mixed 498 183% 849 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 29.1 153% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 19.7 62% 136 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 145%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 111GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -140591459453798 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2561 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 362 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 30134 (EA) Unknown 0 0 27407 (F1) Unknown 0 0 27407 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11184	47.3% Average	Read 198 Write 106 Mixed 106 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 13.3 96% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 30.9 47% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 61%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 108GB free Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9608 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1033 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 118 (AE) Unknown 100 100 139 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 56 188979544097 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 97 97 3 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 70871127302 (F7) Unknown 100 100 131362443 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2224070400	99.8% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 479 Mixed 466 108% 485 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 95.4 4K Mixed 33.7 137% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 18.3 62% 132 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 0636 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 102 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 66%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 582GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 109 Write 110 Mixed 91.6 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 4.76 4K Mixed 0.43 166% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 64%
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 145GB free Firmware: 4.AAB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1845 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 171802808 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1832 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 92 92 8 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 622657573 (C2) HDA temperature 37 48 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 73 94057239 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 4332 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42.1% Average	Read 73.3 Write 73 Mixed 71.8 55% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.42 100% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 41%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 129GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 145 4675 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11177 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 5 5 69904 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2456 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 950 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11127 (C2) HDA temperature 112 97 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45% Average	Read 85.6 Write 70.9 Mixed 74.6 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.32 91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 62%
WD WD1200BEVT-00A23T0 120GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 46GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 139 975 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10064 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12261 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3663 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 264 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 120 120 240228 (C2) HDA temperature 113 82 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	25.1% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 42.9 Mixed 43 33% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.27 83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 17,908 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 32.9 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 29.1 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)