Positivo FX1000

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Positivo FX1000 (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo FX1000
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141121
Uptime	108.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '18 at 08:45
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	21%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 42.7 22% 33 Pts	4-Core 55.4 8-Core 55 7% 55.2 Pts	64-Core 57.1 4% 57.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 161E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.31 1% 2.19 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 3.91 2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600NS34 128GB 339 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 132 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 332 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 668 (A9) Unknown 100 100 131073 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 198 198 17181966347 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 550 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C2) HDA temperature 59 59 176095297577 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2748671232 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4674449408 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2127957228 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2032761407	46% Average	Read 470 Write 162 Mixed 245 64% 292 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 9.77 54% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 29.1 23% 32 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Positivo FX1000

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)