| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q PRO TURBO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121008 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '18 at 03:15 |
| Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.6%
Average
|
39% 60.7 Pts
|
16% 124 Pts
|
10% 160 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1345 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.5%
Poor
|
17% 19.5 fps
|
33% 39.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63% 83.7 MB/s
| |||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.4 GB/s
|
34% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q PRO TURBO Builds (Compare 106 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q PRO TURBO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 9x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 8x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $501 |