HP dx2710 MT(FH282PA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP dx2710 MT(FH282PA) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AFCh
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080422
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 07:33
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130 7,312 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 63 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 37 30% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 43.7 8-Core 42.5 6% 43.1 Pts	64-Core 39.7 2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Palit(1569 0F00) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 4.69 4% 5.2 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 5.07 Splatting 3.48 4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$50 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5513 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 476248478 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24925 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5444 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 330 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 52 740360236 (C2) HDA temperature 44 48 77309411372 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 79 66 205482358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	22.4% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 36.6 Mixed 26.7 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.13 27% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 42%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 7GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 166 165 2675 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7094 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26377 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5446 (BE) vendor-specific 59 43 41 (C2) HDA temperature 102 86 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 19067 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	25.5% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 45.2 Mixed 32.5 30% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.44 101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP dx2710 MT(FH282PA)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)