Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 123 71% 112 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 123 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Microsoft RemoteFX Graphics Device - WDDM 126 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: rdvgumd64.dll Ver. 10.0.16299.15 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 9.92 Parallax 7.53 6% 8.07 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 6.87 Splatting 14.4 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 107GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 508 Write 478 Mixed 476 109% 487 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 11.9 94% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 60.4 DQ Mixed 38.3 31% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 125 slots used 4GB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 25.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.7 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16