Asrock Z77 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Performance  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '16 at 06:34
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 293
47% 338 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 43.3
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 36.7
26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 504
Write 341
Mixed 346
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 16.7
90% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 62.7
74% 129 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
532GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 73.8
Mixed 55.1
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.23
51% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 35.9
Mixed 20.1
38% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1.5TB
993GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 11.3
34% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.34
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
5GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 4.03
Mixed 5.75
10% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.42
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 1.28
95% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Performance Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $295
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback