| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 176C |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150407 |
| Uptime | 5.5 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '18 at 06:20 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.5%
Good
|
59% 98.8 Pts
|
39% 311 Pts
|
22% 363 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.90
|
5.7%
Terrible
|
5% 6.79 fps
|
6% 7.71 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
49% 81.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 564 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8770w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples | 99x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 92x |
| Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples | 296x |
| Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples | 95x |
| Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $100 |