| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120526 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 08 '18 at 20:42 |
| Run Duration | 311 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 96% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
24.6%
Poor
|
23% 34.1 Pts
|
7% 52.5 Pts
|
3% 43.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
ASRock(1849 9640) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
|
1.65%
Terrible
|
2% 2.18 fps
|
2% 2.02 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
36% 49.5 MB/s
|
35% 0.24 MB/s
| |
|
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
3GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.81%
Terrible
|
14% 14.4 MB/s
|
25% 2.04 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.3%
Very poor
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
7% 2.3 GB/s
|
20% 199 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 18x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 10x |
| Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 8x |
| HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $407 |