PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 162B |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160527 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 28 '18 at 17:19 |
Run Duration | 398 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.6%
Good
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
8.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 118x |
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 97x |
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 92x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 340x |
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 21x |
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 18% - Very poor | Total price: $183 |