HP EliteBook 8570p

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 17A7
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130131
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '18 at 06:21
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594 5,754 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 183 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 227 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 17A7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 5.88 Parallax 3.03 4% 4.46 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.43 5% 5.49 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8947 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2566 (B1) Unknown 93 93 79 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 55 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 57 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11757360848	50.6% Above average	Read 465 Write 82.8 Mixed 98 46% 215 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 9 67% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 79.2 DQ Mixed 27.1 59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 191GB free Firmware: GH2OA3C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 219 100 81604378625 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5562 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 9091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2283 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 704375226368 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 59 185991190 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 63 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1245203 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 109579 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	57.7% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 101 Mixed 8.17 50% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.22 87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB 5,422 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.1 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570p Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570p

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	97x
Core i5-3360MIntel $594Bench 54%, 5,754 samples	65x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	63x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	293x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	156x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	11x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16