Dream PA70Hx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDream PA70Hx  (all builds)
MotherboardDream PA70Hx
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 19:54
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 599
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67B1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9077
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Lighting 99
Reflection 112
Parallax 87.6
81% 99.7 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 94.9
75% 90.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67% Good
Read 470
Write 326
Mixed 330
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 13.5
92% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 13.8
18% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FDD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback