Acer Veriton M661

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Veriton M661 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EQ35M
Memory	3.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '18 at 01:00
Run Duration	367 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38 10,428 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 65.1 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 55.3 34% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 104 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 4.03 4% 5.19 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 4 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150 10,362 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 456GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 176 5191 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15032 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 38385 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 14736 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 823 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 15047 (C2) HDA temperature 113 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 73 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.9% Average	Read 78.9 Write 76.9 Mixed 74.3 58% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.39 115% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 464GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 92 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 95 (03) Spinup time 121 100 12897222846 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1090 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 262148 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 142 100 29 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9691 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1029 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 99 99 131071 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 1397 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 60 489029669 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1101 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1101 (C2) HDA temperature 162 150 171799609381 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.3% Very good	Read 129 Write 134 Mixed 128 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.37 92% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 76%
Toshiba MK2555GSX H 250GB 539 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 232GB free Firmware: FG001Q Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1025 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3824 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5128 (0A) Spinup retry count 176 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3646 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 728 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 417 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 98677 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159151141 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 13 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 83 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3421 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 330 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	41.5% Average	Read 69.3 Write 75.1 Mixed 65.3 52% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.25 70% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 42%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 224GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 174 (03) Spinup time 155 153 3233 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2106 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 36257 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 966 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 232 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2106 (C2) HDA temperature 107 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 97.7 Mixed 95.7 74% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.39 112% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 58%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA70K Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 230 230 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 7034 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 10318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 6400 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 197765 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 60 60 401954 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 249108758565 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6691 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	31.8% Below average	Read 66.6 Write 44.1 Mixed 44.3 39% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.29 72% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 46%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID a815 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	5.05% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 5.98 Mixed 7.26 11% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.93 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 19% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.05% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Veriton M661 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer Veriton M661

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 4,070 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer Veriton M661

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer Veriton M661

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)