HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '18 at 18:53
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 91 2-Core 179 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 356 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.5% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.44 4% 4.28 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SATA SSD 128GB 499 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 38442 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 547 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 83 83 617 (B2) Unknown 92 92 162 (B3) Unknown 92 92 318 (B4) Unknown 92 92 3714 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 18 (E8) Unknown 92 92 1854 (F1) Unknown 73 73 23422980798 (F2) Unknown 83 83 22991893563	28.3% Poor	Read 479 Write 32.1 Mixed 53.4 40% 188 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 2.17 26% 6.25 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 72%
Excelstor Technology J9250S 250GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 147GB free Firmware: GM2OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 143 (03) Spinup time 98 98 17193566416 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4295 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 28 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 79792 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 848 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5510 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5510 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 219043921948 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1645	37.8% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 64.2 Mixed 74.2 52% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.18 36% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5595-003.A00LF Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Adata 10GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.9% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.7 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	596x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	140x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16