Asus Q170T

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Q170T (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170116
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '18 at 19:05
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7320-$42 423 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 221 86% 148 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 362 48% 362 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4508 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.81% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 6.88 6% 8.19 fps	MRender 9.43 Gravity 5.87 Splatting 15.6 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.81% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2410 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1441 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6688024557	96.4% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 402 Mixed 409 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 19.6 131% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 16.9 96% 220 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 124%
ASMT 2105 2TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 143 Write 134 Mixed 134 175% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.29 97% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 22.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 24.3 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q170T Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170T

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1x
Core i3-7100TIntelBench 61%, 2,911 samples	1x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	2x

SSD
SNVS250G 250GBKingstonBench 160%, 4,574 samples	1x
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	1x

RAM
8G2400MHz 89C2 M378A2G43MB1-CTD 24GBUnknownBench 68%, 1 sample	1x
AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 2x8GBAdataBench 72%, 51 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16