Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 808
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.2% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 69.8
69% 77.5 fps
MRender 76.6
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 74.6
62% 75.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 493
Write 260
Mixed 273
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 22.9
96% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 46.6
76% 150 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 92%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
672GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 161
Mixed 157
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.36
124% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
652GB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 75.5
71% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.16
4K Write 5.34
4K Mixed 0.34
185% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
273GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 143
Write 145
Mixed 128
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 30.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback