Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '18 at 12:38
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 396
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2660) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 23.3
20% 23.8 fps
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 25
22% 25 fps
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
60GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 425
Write 421
Mixed 418
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 10.5
65% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 69.8
99% 183 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 101%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$91
52GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85.9
Write 80.6
Mixed 73.9
60% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.18
73% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 87%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.1
Mixed 98.5
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.82
4K Mixed 0.52
144% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
10GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 67.1
Mixed 58
48% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.31
86% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback