Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '18 at 18:07
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 149
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B4) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 15.7
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 20.3
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 195
Write 176
Mixed 161
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 10.4
61% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 9.67
19% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 87.3
Mixed 88.1
69% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.14
75% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
226GB free
Firmware: PB2ZC61H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 79.6
Write 70.7
Mixed 65
54% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 45%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
55GB free
Firmware: CC66 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 73.3
Write 82.8
Mixed 16.9
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.44
106% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $219
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback