Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 144
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 449
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
PNY(196E 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
382GB free
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 456
Write 464
Mixed 377
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 25.3
102% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 64.8
72% 121 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 114%
FCCT256M4SSD1 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 482
Write 257
Mixed 236
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 4.54
67% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 6.05
34% 79 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 75%
FCCT480M500SSD1 480GB
79GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 473
Write 399
Mixed 301
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 23.8
73% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 56.2
71% 127 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 20.3
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.53
118% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04H1BB31-16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback