| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20120627 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '18 at 11:09 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.9%
Good
|
64% 107 Pts
|
44% 362 Pts
|
30% 482 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
|
28.8%
Poor
|
28% 37.1 fps
|
30% 38.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
55.6%
Above average
|
72% 95.1 MB/s
|
120% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
72% 95.7 MB/s
|
76% 0.72 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
44.1%
Average
|
44% 15.6 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
55% 72.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 82x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 53x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $680 |