Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	61.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 04:05
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 56.9 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 174 59% 106 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 637 58% 488 Pts	64-Core 1,623 100% 1,623 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 53.8 34% 44.6 fps	MRender 53 Gravity 48.2 Splatting 35.7 36% 45.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3587 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 911 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20276924338	70.2% Very good	Read 476 Write 373 Mixed 384 91% 411 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 22.7 66% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 78.9 83% 139 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 33GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2501 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 692 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19175252279	74.7% Very good	Read 471 Write 374 Mixed 384 91% 410 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 23.4 76% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 83.9 96% 166 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 18GB free Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2918119 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 123214021803217 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3041 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 166 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 46 55837589530 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2918119 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2918119 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2918119 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21773 (EA) Unknown 0 0 18154 (F1) Unknown 0 0 18154 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19294	40.4% Average	Read 255 Write 126 Mixed 174 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 13.9 53% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 41.2 59% 109 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 8x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 33.5 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.8 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $378

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16