Hp-pavilion GU590AA-AKB m9070

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion GU590AA-AKB m9070  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Nettle2
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration447 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 23.3
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 71.6
25% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 81
8-Core 78.6
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 80.6
5% 80.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Gigabyte(1458 3547) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 2.3
2% 3.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 64
Write 51.5
Mixed 58.3
44% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.39
93% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 43%
Toshiba External USB HDD 640GB
15GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Read 12.6
Write 12.1
Mixed 10.9
15% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.22
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 19%
Patriot Memory 8GB
7GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 9.45
Mixed 8.6
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.02
22% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 13%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
5GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 12.1
Write 9.69
Mixed 10.3
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.45
53% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 297
14% 297 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback