| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160923 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 30 '17 at 21:29 |
| Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.5%
Very good
|
76% 126 Pts
|
38% 292 Pts
|
19% 302 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71
|
133%
Outstanding
|
154% 196 fps
|
116% 144 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
107% 142 MB/s
|
89% 0.82 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HMAH2GU6MFR8N-TF Avant W641GU42J7240NB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
79.1%
Very good
|
79% 27.8 GB/s
|
68% 24 GB/s
|
69% 58.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 662 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 253x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 99x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 90x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 133x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 96x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $236 |