PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 9.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-G (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20150722 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 30 '17 at 12:40 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1830-$35
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 8A96) 1GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
9.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
95.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
88.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 965x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 788x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 534x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 481x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 404x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 372x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $317 |