Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 08:01
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 31.7
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 107
35% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 96.2
18% 127 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2562 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 83.5
Parallax 64.9
50% 70.1 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 52.6
47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Spark 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 311
Write 218
Mixed 269
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 8.28
58% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 39.6
DQ Mixed 0.11
8% 19 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 119
88% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
61GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65% Good
Read 101
Write 126
Mixed 94.1
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.29
102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback