| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170824 |
| Uptime | 6 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 16 '17 at 00:03 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71%
Very good
|
68% 121 Pts
|
61% 501 Pts
|
62% 995 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 20.4 fps
|
20% 24.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
74.4%
Very good
|
91% 410 MB/s
|
98% 33.6 MB/s
|
47% 74.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38%
Below average
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
40% 98.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 128 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 19x |
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 13x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $732 |