Sony VPCCA17FL

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Sony VPCCA17FL (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110217
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '17 at 03:59
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 71.2 1-Core 21 2-Core 41.2 33% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 94.2 8-Core 94 13% 94.1 Pts	64-Core 94.1 6% 94.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sony(104D 9080) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.1.0.0 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.81 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU120G1122 120GB 2,087 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3106000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 603 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 879 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4217728992296 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 19 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6 (AE) Unknown 100 100 38 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 40 257698037799 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1520424714594 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 810 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4973 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1780 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2189 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	36.3% Below average	Read 477 Write 138 Mixed 228 61% 281 MB/s	4K Read 7.72 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 3.71 27% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 3.18 7% 15 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 98.7 40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony VPCCA17FL

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)