Toshiba SATELLITE Click Mini L9W-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE Click Mini L9W-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 21:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 15
2-Core 29.6
28% 36 Pts
4-Core 59.9
8-Core 59.7
8% 59.8 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F850) 1,017MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.79 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.09
1% 1.08 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba 032GE4 31GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 163
Write 68.5
Mixed 86.8
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 0.25
4K Mixed 0.32
28% 6.25 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 26%
Generic SD64G SD Card 64GB
29GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback