HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory29.7 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 12:02
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 88.3
42% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 493
42% 364 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 70.4
Write 69.2
Mixed 68.5
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.41
95% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351R7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback