Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '17 at 14:50
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 202 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 696 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 951 59% 951 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.4 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 80.8 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 101 66% 79.9 fps	MRender 57.5 Gravity 76.1 Splatting 74 57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 16681995 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 19859928803489 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2930 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 368 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 73 51544391710 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16681995 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16681995 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16681995 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15097 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10842 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10842 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7102	56.9% Above average	Read 493 Write 121 Mixed 197 59% 270 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 13.8 82% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 46.3 57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 87%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 214GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3950 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3177 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2569 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 408 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2768 (C2) HDA temperature 110 99 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.7% Good	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 118 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.41 106% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 126GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 886 (03) Spinup time 170 169 4475 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4751 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 33506 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2554 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 438 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4312 (C2) HDA temperature 112 76 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 193 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 198 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 31 174	35.6% Below average	Read 58.7 Write 65.2 Mixed 54.6 45% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 76%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 90GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 142 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5103 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4747 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2723 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 260 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4845 (C2) HDA temperature 108 99 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.4% Average	Read 76 Write 78.6 Mixed 85.1 60% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C14 Series 2x8GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 26.9 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 21.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)