Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '17 at 22:10
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 213 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 659 63% 519 Pts	64-Core 800 50% 800 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 3604) 3GB CLim: 1353 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 55 Parallax 71.3 52% 63.4 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 71.9 Splatting 52.1 52% 65.6 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 427GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6200 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1236 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 50 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 167 (F1) Unknown 99 99 34085711004
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Plextor M5 Pro 256GB-$100 2,451 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 236GB free Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2718 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3928 (B1) Unknown 100 100 340258 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 717 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 12 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2136687 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1965702	95.2% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 441 Mixed 461 105% 473 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 34.1 122% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 91.8 106% 181 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 106%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 721 Write 529 Mixed 563 134% 604 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 34.6 151% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 117 131% 225 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 236%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA614 4TB 361 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: A5DEKN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 112 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34385822094 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1122 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5875 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1088 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 11903 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 11903 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 223339151395 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 95294085916 (F2) Unknown 100 100 211282298343	82.4% Excellent	Read 139 Write 148 Mixed 154 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.53 140% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 110%
Hitachi HUS726040ALA610 4TB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 894GB free Firmware: A5GNT907 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 108 (03) Spinup time 136 136 30090527112 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 418 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3388 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 397 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5225 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5225 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 223339479076 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 134 Mixed 124 97% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 3.08 4K Mixed 0.52 154% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 112%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 553GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 175 6083 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1559 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7888 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1467 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 209 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14980 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	63% Good	Read 118 Write 101 Mixed 100 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.23 98% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GB 1,630 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 34.5 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 21 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	428x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16