HP 550-262ng

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 550-262ng (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B52
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160301
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '17 at 11:19
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 123 50% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 204 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Lighting 77.8 Reflection 77.4 Parallax 66.6 63% 73.9 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 72 Splatting 72.7 59% 72 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB 2,903 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2387 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 25 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 763 (AA) Unknown 100 100 773 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 97 97 45 (AE) Unknown 99 99 25 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1143 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	63% Good	Read 467 Write 219 Mixed 294 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 17 98% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 71.2 DQ Mixed 58.3 42% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 173GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 100 75 (03) Spinup time 127 100 12896698549 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 789 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 100 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2385 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 761 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 63 304152609 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 790 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 790 (C2) HDA temperature 181 162 158914576417 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.4% Good	Read 106 Write 108 Mixed 112 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698651-154-MCN 1x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 550-262ng

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)