Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '17 at 12:48
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 275 87% 163 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 971 88% 737 Pts	64-Core 1,777 110% 1,777 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.3% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 66.9 55% 68.3 fps	MRender 69.4 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 67.9 55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 277GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5124 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1329 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 51 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 238 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19887261977	77.8% Very good	Read 500 Write 395 Mixed 412 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 26.2 101% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 63.2 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 29.5 32% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7513 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2029 (B1) Unknown 98 98 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 48 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1435 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12246585686	58.7% Above average	Read 496 Write 227 Mixed 357 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 11.2 77% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78.9 DQ Write 53.8 DQ Mixed 27 31% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 118%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4.5TB free Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 125822248 (03) Spinup time 90 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3978 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5687852 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4329 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1020 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 52 656408615 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 3795 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8453 (C2) HDA temperature 39 48 51539607591 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 117 99 125822248 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -107799384161093 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6398773531 (F2) Unknown 100 253 215975690440
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 186 9266 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4441 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4711 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1321 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1013 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13552 (C2) HDA temperature 114 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	84.6% Excellent	Read 138 Write 157 Mixed 134 107% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.31 117% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 98%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 168 8350 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5053 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6918 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1996 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1667 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 40237 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	53% Above average	Read 89.9 Write 94.6 Mixed 92.6 70% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.15 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: ST6O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 119 (03) Spinup time 128 128 38681510372 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11837 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19190 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5172 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 11990 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 11990 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 244814053418 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 31% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 25.6 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	495x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	261x
Core i7-7740XIntel $189Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	169x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	93x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	61x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $797

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16