Asrock 870iCafe R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 870iCafe R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130702
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 18:07
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 76.8 1-Core 59 2-Core 111 52% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 265 29% 231 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 048D) CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 41.8 28% 35.7 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 28.9 Splatting 36.9 26% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 132 4083 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2224 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9891 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1607 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1891 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 170 170 90664 (C2) HDA temperature 115 107 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.6% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 92.3 Mixed 99.3 73% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.73 4K Mixed 0.22 66% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 200GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 131576072 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4662 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 111957170 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16102 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2865 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885098501 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 59 538837024 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 372 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 56 56 88623 (C2) HDA temperature 32 41 73014444064 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -30889404782922 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -9710079611728 (F2) Unknown 100 253 117091883134066	75.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 141 Mixed 116 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.41 92% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 112%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 71GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 180 3875 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11530 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 5 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 34150 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6979 (BE) vendor-specific 49 33 51 (C2) HDA temperature 96 80 51 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.1% Below average	Read 55.4 Write 55.9 Mixed 55.7 42% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.49 121% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB 1,719 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870iCafe R2.0 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870iCafe R2.0

CPU
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	2x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
Force LS 60GBCorsair $57Bench 55%, 3,190 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x

RAM
AE34G1339U2 HU524303EP0200 HU524303EP0200 HU524303EP0200 10GBUnknownBench 30%, 2 samples	2x
99U5474-013.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 43%, 317 samples	1x
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 44%, 1,202 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $57

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16