Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 700G7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP700G7C-S02US
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130320
Uptime23.5 Days
Run DateDec 20 '15 at 03:05
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 431
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M
Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 13.3
12% 15.3 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 16.2
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF4OA0D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 66.6
Mixed 80.9
56% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.07
33% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 68%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
23GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 73.8
Write 69.8
Mixed 84.4
58% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback