User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPOSITIVO POS-EIH61CE
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH61CE
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110517
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 00:50
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-2120-$101
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.3% Average
SC Int 61.2
SC Float 59.6
SC Mixed 78.2
53% 66.3 Pts
QC Int 122
QC Float 156
QC Mixed 196
36% 158 Pts
MC Int 181
MC Float 179
MC Mixed 190
28% 184 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$129
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 116
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 103
34% 95.3 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 74.8
37% 85 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 37%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 85.1
Write 92.7
Mixed 100
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.41
79% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905403-888.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i7-7700K $329AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback