| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160620 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 18:46 |
| Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6402P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
62%
Good
|
68% 120 Pts
|
38% 283 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
26% 29 fps
|
26% 32.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
627GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
114% 152 MB/s
|
80% 0.86 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
29.8%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
20% 7.17 GB/s
|
45% 88.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,131 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 393x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 384x |
| Core i5-7400Intel $93Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 354x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 401x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 349x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 217x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $295 |