Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '17 at 23:24
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 120 56% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 326 33% 269 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.4% Very good	Lighting 86.6 Reflection 119 Parallax 137 71% 114 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 128 Splatting 111 96% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2419 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 339 (B1) Unknown 99 99 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 51 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8023926607	95.7% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 459 Mixed 490 108% 486 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 38.6 131% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 73.2 75% 123 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 124%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB 4,891 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 260GB free Firmware: GU00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2632 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2806 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 21686 (0A) Spinup retry count 156 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1620 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 265 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 98 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 43 43 579389 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864445983 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 209 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 16435 (DE) Loaded hours 76 76 9713 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 366 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	25.6% Poor	Read 48.9 Write 40 Mixed 45.9 34% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 49%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 190GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 226 1100 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3470 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25622 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2487 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 368 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3468 (C2) HDA temperature 111 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 77.9 Mixed 76.9 63% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.39 109% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 65%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 57GB free Firmware: 3.AD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 80 33063555 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5027 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 13572508410 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 42083 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2692 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 82 82 18 (BE) vendor-specific 59 48 690552873 (C2) HDA temperature 41 52 68719476777 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 74 45 96682917 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.7% Poor	Read 54.8 Write 34.5 Mixed 44.7 34% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.38 91% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 17.6 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.1 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $689

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16