Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer (all builds)
Memory	53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '17 at 04:16
Run Duration	391 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.00GHz 745 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 62.2 2-Core 119 51% 83.9 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 530 46% 391 Pts	64-Core 1,254 78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Lighting 23.8 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 30.5 19% 25.8 fps	MRender 31.6 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 24.7 23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 910 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 195 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C2) HDA temperature 69 64 154620264479 (F1) Unknown 100 100 42717	58.9% Above average	Read 508 Write 354 Mixed 349 89% 404 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 7.37 48% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 6.28 20% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 95%
OCZ Vector 180 120GB-$100 358 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 29GB free Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3311 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 820 (AB) Unknown 100 100 40858704 (AE) Unknown 100 100 57 (BE) vendor-specific 100 100 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 66 (D2) Unknown 100 100 5 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2444 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3438 (F9) Unknown 100 100 161175824	68.2% Good	Read 509 Write 429 Mixed 441 102% 460 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 17.8 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 43.4 DQ Mixed 69.6 42% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 872GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 172 4250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1046 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2089 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 555 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5592 (C2) HDA temperature 117 112 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 136 Mixed 112 94% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.28 100% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 84%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65 3,754 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 476GB free Firmware: 1V03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 175 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2972 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1875 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 337 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2634 (C2) HDA temperature 112 102 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.4% Very good	Read 159 Write 107 Mixed 102 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.38 109% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 77%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 181GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 180 5941 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1028 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2134 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 557 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9920 (C2) HDA temperature 118 113 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61% Good	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 92.7 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.23 80% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 84%
WD Re 1TB (2013)-$65 3,754 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 180GB free Firmware: 1V03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 184 175 3800 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3606 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7844 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1878 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 339 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3267 (C2) HDA temperature 109 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 548 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	62.1% Good	Read 114 Write 102 Mixed 98.7 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.43 113% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 77%
ZMVE Ext Hard Disk 500GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 104GB free, PID 0010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 30.5 Mixed 29.4 39% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.11 40% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 16GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.24% Terrible	Read 41.2 Write 6.75 Mixed 12.4 19% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.54 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 28% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.24% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x16GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 52.3 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 43.3 123% 43.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	51x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	5x
HyperX 3000 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 2,054 samples	4x
GR2133D464L15/8G 2x8GBGoodramBench 73%, 520 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16