HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110610
Uptime	10.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '17 at 20:42
Run Duration	452 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 166 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 330 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 75GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 49 18688175 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7543 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 994808044 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 29963 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3718 (C2) HDA temperature 30 55 21474836510 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 49 18688175 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	21.8% Poor	Read 38.7 Write 37.2 Mixed 37.8 29% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.34 77% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$112 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 93 65537 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 93 (03) Spinup time 116 100 25791103301 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1640 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 99 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16286 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1638 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 38744558032 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 61 354615326 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1640 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1640 (C2) HDA temperature 200 153 167504379934 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.7% Average	Read 86.4 Write 86.9 Mixed 91 67% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.33 80% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 169 4133 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6213 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5773 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 811 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 44049 (C2) HDA temperature 121 110 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.1% Good	Read 106 Write 107 Mixed 100 79% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 84%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 46GB free, PID 0181 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	9.93% Terrible	Read 26.3 Write 15.1 Mixed 2.25 15% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.98 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.56 52% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 19%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 42GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 8.86 Mixed 18.6 21% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.02 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.55 67% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 35%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 16GB free, PID 0181 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 19 Write 9 Mixed 7.84 13% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.82 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.37 39% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F 42GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.9% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	536x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	489x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16