ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Blade Pro
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150210
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '17 at 01:46
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 198 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 434 49% 383 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 674C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.81% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 6.41 3% 9.2 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 7.39 5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.81% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE512HMHP-00000 512GB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT4100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2025 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1727 (B1) Unknown 99 99 99 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 33 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 92 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10260853740 (F2) Unknown 99 99 8154052130	72.5% Very good	Read 513 Write 207 Mixed 319 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 18.7 119% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 34 48% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 688GB free Firmware: SE0OA4A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 128 128 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2070 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1693 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 39585 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 227634184223 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	51.6% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 90.1 Mixed 90.2 68% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 16.9 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	125x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	94x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	122x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	62x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	59x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	35x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	24x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples	82x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback