Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160628
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 06:40
Run Duration	425 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 94.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 240 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 907 82% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,239 77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 126 Parallax 127 88% 120 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 109 Splatting 95.3 83% 103 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 155GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1627 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 652 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 36 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 129 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6413421449
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 155GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1627 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 652 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 37 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 129 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6421105247
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,511 Write 790 Mixed 1,119 252% 1,140 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 46.5 165% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 93.8 100% 171 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 283%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0106 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 142 Mixed 138 108% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.28 113% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0106 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 110 Write 105 Mixed 97.6 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.28 103% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 506GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 172 2008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 795 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1933 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 716 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 146 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 648 (C2) HDA temperature 107 82 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	88.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 160 Mixed 152 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.21 101% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 108%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1GB free Firmware: 10.02E04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 251 182 2433 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10714 (05) Reallocated sector count 197 197 18 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18441 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5161 (BE) vendor-specific 74 33 26 (C2) HDA temperature 124 83 26 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 30.9 Mixed 32.2 25% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.27 65% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 27GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.77% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 3.89 Mixed 7.17 8% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.48 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.89 82% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.77% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 8x8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 55.3 MC Write 45 MC Mixed 48.2 141% 49.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 24.7 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

CPU
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	560x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	529x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	470x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	216x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	199x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $117Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $888

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16