Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 18:49
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 313 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 590 8-Core 872 91% 731 Pts	64-Core 871 54% 871 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 0426) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 163 Parallax 141 132% 155 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 151 Splatting 118 106% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 2010 Write 1,067 Mixed 1,199 314% 1,425 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 40.6 142% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 637 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 226 217% 355 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 254%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 179GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 17399 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 76 69 7575 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6111 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12486 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2543 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 147 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 176094773277 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 97 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 153 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 10209	73.1% Very good	Read 113 Write 141 Mixed 105 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 3.13 4K Mixed 0.49 134% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 75%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 58GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 98 134312107 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5511 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 106591451 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2478 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 83 8590065693 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 471466012 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 68719476764 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 32 134312107 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -5063766419474 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3347208404 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3991052925	50.2% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 81.5 Mixed 77.7 63% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.52 100% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB 599 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 26 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26.7 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,159x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	178x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	340x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	92x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	62x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	81x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	56x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16