Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 04:05
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 179 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 332 43% 325 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E344) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.3 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 26.1 Reflection 27.9 Parallax 32.3 21% 28.8 fps	MRender 29.6 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 33 25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 526GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 171 2208 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 481 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9750 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 447 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 238 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 361 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 140 Mixed 127 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.27 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.23 120% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 9GB free Firmware: 1306 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 77.6 Write 81.4 Mixed 80.1 60% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.22 58% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free Firmware: 0707 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 113 Write 121 Mixed 65.8 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 3.72 4K Mixed 0.47 165% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 66%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14 6,096 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 866 (03) Spinup time 153 143 1308 (04) Start/Stop count 33 33 67904 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6743 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1989 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 224 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 937 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 142 142 176122 (C2) HDA temperature 119 87 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	32.2% Below average	Read 48.1 Write 64.1 Mixed 67.9 46% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.22 60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 54%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$40 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 126 4400 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6328 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20384 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1714 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1381 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6318 (C2) HDA temperature 113 93 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 25 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.2% Below average	Read 57 Write 54.8 Mixed 52.1 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.4 103% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 81GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 35.6 Mixed 20.2 38% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.29 61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905584-017.A00LF 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,183x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	502x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	490x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	565x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	479x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	167x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	149x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	147x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16