Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateOct 11 '17 at 17:38
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 746
72% 595 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.4
39% 49 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 62.1
48% 59 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
422GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 409
Mixed 419
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 53.7
199% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 133
154% 267 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
378GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 314
Write 197
Mixed 168
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 11.8
74% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 15.3
58% 130 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 417
Mixed 414
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 48.8
191% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 113
145% 261 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
525GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 172
Write 137
Mixed 142
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.25
111% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 108%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB
923GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 102
Write 93.2
Mixed 73.9
112% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%
ADATA HV100 1TB
763GB free, PID a42a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 99.6
Write 38.8
Mixed 35.8
62% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.18
18% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback