Gigabyte GA-P43T-ES3G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P43T-ES3G  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '17 at 14:05
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 108
49% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Sapphire(174B E193) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.3.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 3.94
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 5.39
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 8 500GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7500A50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 83.6
Mixed 26
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.24
69% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P43T-ES3G Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P43T-ES3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback