Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '17 at 00:02
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 124 50% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 413 40% 327 Pts	64-Core 532 33% 532 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27% Poor	Lighting 31.3 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 36.9 26% 32.2 fps	MRender 40.6 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 32.6 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4369 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1021 (B1) Unknown 98 98 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 38 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 401 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33285182103	83% Excellent	Read 506 Write 400 Mixed 416 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 22.3 117% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 39.8 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 22.4 35% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB 8,189 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 185119832 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 739 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 280 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 1356726 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1032 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 348 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 33 -82269408722903 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 934 (C2) HDA temperature 41 67 64424509481 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 12 185119832 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 96452080567371 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31010716 (F2) Unknown 100 253 379031572	93.2% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 161 Mixed 155 120% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.25 82% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 72198328 (03) Spinup time 96 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 844 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5471731 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2740 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 344 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 32 -53080844664793 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 128 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4278 (C2) HDA temperature 39 68 73014444071 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 34076270528024 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22506287400 (F2) Unknown 100 253 11261183543	91.2% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 151 Mixed 146 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.24 88% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 113%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 155GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 57.1 Write 65 Mixed 55.6 77% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.34 56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 5GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 149 Write 91.2 Mixed 108 139% 116 MB/s	4K Read 6.11 4K Write 3.45 4K Mixed 1.47 190% 3.68 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 40%
CBM Flash Disk 8GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 2092 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 9.57 Mixed 11.6 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.008 39% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.8% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 19.7 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)