Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 73.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 950 85% 719 Pts	64-Core 1,329 82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36DD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1767 MHz, MLim: 1860 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 125 Parallax 112 100% 120 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 110 Splatting 99.6 84% 102 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 2,019 Write 899 Mixed 1,124 296% 1,347 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 28 164% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 27 69% 143 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 54GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4724900 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 87522843569277 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1246 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 782 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 46 107377197090 (C2) HDA temperature 34 46 107377197090 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4724900 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4724900 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4724900 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3004 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1621 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1621 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2105	77.9% Very good	Read 517 Write 200 Mixed 256 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 22.7 126% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 55.1 76% 139 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 87%
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 36GB free Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5564 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 244 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 246 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1245244 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 65 (C2) HDA temperature 63 51 210454904869 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2537 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2226 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1577 (F4) Unknown 100 100 19 (F5) Unknown 100 100 60 (F6) Unknown 100 100 682688	87.9% Excellent	Read 524 Write 416 Mixed 459 104% 466 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 80.1 4K Mixed 13.4 102% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 14 83% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 682GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 125 115 6741 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1117 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2954 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 806 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 356 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 139854 (C2) HDA temperature 110 90 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39% Below average	Read 68 Write 67.9 Mixed 62 50% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.23 51% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 684GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1743 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5672 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1187 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 717 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1025 (C2) HDA temperature 107 90 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.7% Above average	Read 97.6 Write 99.6 Mixed 93.9 73% 97 MB/s	4K Read 1.17 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.34 130% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,062

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)