Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung 700Z3C/700Z5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130207
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '15 at 22:01
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 125
42% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 320
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.12 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
3% 3.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 476
Write 289
Mixed 271
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 21
78% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 74.8
79% 126 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 100%
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
1GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 125
Write 24.8
Mixed 28.9
13% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 6.65
4K Mixed 4.32
25% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 19.2
Write 17.5
Mixed 17.5
23% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.86
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 1.15
100% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 22%
Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback