Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '17 at 22:16
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 223 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 622 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 10 10% 10.5 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 8.57 Splatting 11.3 8% 9.58 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4431159048 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -8753143346080 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1280 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 133 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 47 68722556960 (C2) HDA temperature 32 47 68722556960 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 116 116 4431159048 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 116 116 4431159048 (CC) Soft ECC correction 116 116 4431159048 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8013 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6311 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6311 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4555 (F4) Unknown 98 98 6094928	54.9% Above average	Read 395 Write 111 Mixed 157 48% 221 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 12.8 99% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 50.2 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 11.3 30% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 73%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 30GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 151 5108 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9265 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17205 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9149 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1681 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9279 (C2) HDA temperature 113 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 90 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.7% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 59 Mixed 59.5 44% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.36 93% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 60%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1GB free Firmware: 1AC01109 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2710 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12374 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18482 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 11 (0C) Power cycle count 89 89 10806 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 55 404095000 (C2) HDA temperature 75 52 437452825 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 224396 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	44.7% Average	Read 74.9 Write 80.4 Mixed 76.3 58% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.55 134% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 62%
Wilk 16GB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 12GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 5.07 Mixed 6.33 9% 8.23 MB/s	4K Read 3.63 4K Write 0.18 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)