Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '17 at 22:05
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 228
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 458
61% 456 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 55.8
38% 51.5 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 38.9
35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 398
Write 20.4
Mixed 75.1
35% 165 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 9.97
84% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 20
25% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
456GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 15.4
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.86
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
372GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 80
Write 77
Mixed 29.8
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.47
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
41GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 89.8
Write 80.7
Mixed 46.1
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.47
94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
17GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 47
Mixed 9.68
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.14
57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 47%
WD My Book 1140 1TB
505GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 60.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 64.1
84% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.14
55% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 48%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
23GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 145
Write 17.7
Mixed 33
59% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.74
82% 2.76 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback